Panna Udvardy vs Julie Belgraver Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Belgraver slightly edges out Udvardy in second serve performance, winning 43.57% of points compared to 43.14% for Udvardy. Could this small advantage influence the match outcome?
• In returning second serves, Udvardy has a marginal advantage, claiming 49.24% of points against Belgraver’s 48.4%.
• Belgraver leads in returning first serves with 32.77%, whereas Udvardy trails with 30.69%. How crucial will this be in the match?
• Under pressure, Udvardy shows a slight edge with a 53.28% breakpoint save rate, while Belgraver saves 52.53% of crucial points.
• In recent match performances, Belgraver has a higher win rate of 60.56%, while Udvardy stands at 59.02% over the past year.
• Belgraver excels on hard surfaces with a 63% career win rate, but falters on indoor hard courts with 52%. Udvardy’s best performance is on clay, where they win 63%, but only 44% on indoor hard courts.
• Both players have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF > $10K tournaments, with Belgraver winning 61.76% of matches and Udvardy winning 58%.
• Considering opponent quality, Udvardy's average competitor rank is higher at 229.16, compared to Belgraver's 324.14.
• In deciding sets, Belgraver is formidable, winning 69% of such matches, whereas Udvardy has succeeded 44% of the time.
• For break point conversion, a crucial in-game factor, Belgraver is more effective, converting 40.98% of opportunities, in contrast to Udvardy's 33.85%.

Editorial Prediction (June 21, 2025, UTC):

As Belgraver and Udvardy prepare for their upcoming match, a close examination of their stats reveals nuanced dynamics that may influence the outcome. Although both demonstrate commendable performance levels, the slight discrepancies in their stats could play a determining role.

Belgraver holds a marginal advantage on second serves and, crucially, on returning first serves, which could tilt rallies in their favor. Additionally, their superior performance in deciding sets may boost their confidence in extended matches. Furthermore, Belgraver's higher breakpoint conversion is an important strength that could see them capitalize on crucial moments.

While Udvardy fares better in returning second serves and saving breakpoints, their challenges on indoor hard courts and less effective performance in deciding sets pose potential vulnerabilities.

Overall, given the minuscule margins and specific strengths, Belgraver appears to be the slight favorite in this matchup, with their ability to exploit key moments likely giving them the edge in this encounter.